Price trades below an earlier low, then closes back above it. Has support broken? The lower price did trade, but where the candle finishes and what follows tell you whether that move is holding.
The October 28 quiz, Price Made a New Low. Did It Really Break?, uses an original constructed chart. Its question offers SWEEP, BREAKOUT or TOO EARLY. Here, a sweep means a move beyond an established boundary that returns inside and is followed by a hold. That is the convention used in this example; the label alone doesn't give you a trade.
Establish the low before examining the breach
Two earlier declines reached 100 at candles 5 and 12. Their recoveries make 100 a reference before the later move below it. Without that earlier structure, a long lower wick would be an isolated observation.
Candle 21 trades down to 96 and closes at 101, back above the earlier lows. It closes below its own open at 102, so its body is bearish. Its color doesn't cancel the reclaim: the relevant comparison is its close against 100.
Someone who sold the break might have expected price to remain below the old lows. The return challenges that expectation. Buyers may have met the decline, and some sellers may have reduced exposure. These are possible explanations. The chart cannot identify their orders or establish that anyone deliberately hunted stops.
Check whether the return survives
Candle 22 closes at 104. The distinct pullback at candle 23 reaches 100.5 and closes at 101.5. Candles 24 and 25 also finish above 100, with the final close at 103.
Together, the breach, closed return and subsequent hold support SWEEP at the quiz's pause. A wick below the line by itself would leave less evidence. Continued closes below 100 would instead support a breakdown that was holding; a return that failed again would require reassessment.
Recognition leaves a separate risk decision
The source illustrates a possible long at 103, stop at 95 below the full 96 extreme, and target at the earlier highs of 119. That is eight price units of risk for sixteen of potential reward, or planned 2R before costs. No later candles, exit or achieved target appear in the video.
That wider stop protects a specific premise: the whole rejected low survives. Moving it just beneath a small green candle would express a different idea and needs its own reason. The earlier highs are a possible objective; nearer swing highs can still interrupt a recovery before price reaches them.
The linked practice examines an earlier local entry after candle 24, at the next open of 102.5. Its local return premise uses stop 100 below the retest low of 100.5 and the nearer rebound highs at 105 as its objective: planned 1R. It gives up the wider protection of the video's 95 stop. Separate authored continuations include a valid loss and a missing-response case; they are not video outcomes. Compare this rejected move with a breakout that holds above its boundary, and keep the pattern name separate from a forecast.